<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenExpo revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://untangled.biz/blog/kde/openexpo-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://untangled.biz/kde/openexpo-revisited/</link>
	<description>Alexandra Thinks About Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueget</title>
		<link>http://untangled.biz/kde/openexpo-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-8349</link>
		<dc:creator>blueget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untangled.biz/blog/uncategorized/openexpo-2/#comment-8349</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, nearly all recent compact cameras are crap. They have extremely much megapixels, but the pictures are noisy like hell if taken at higher ISO Levels, which means that pictures taken inside rooms are either very noisy or have to be taken with flash (unfortunately, the integrated flash is often crappy as well). This is my experience, but it might be unfair as I compared max. 200€-compact cameras with my rather bulky back-then 600€-SLR (it&#039;s an Canon EOS 400D, which is sold for under 400€ now).                                  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven&#039;t tested the camera myself, but the Lumix DMC-FX35 from Panasonic gets pretty good reviews and the price (180€) seems reasonable. Don&#039;t expect too much from it, but the pictures are certainly a gigantic leap from a mobile phone cam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, nearly all recent compact cameras are crap. They have extremely much megapixels, but the pictures are noisy like hell if taken at higher ISO Levels, which means that pictures taken inside rooms are either very noisy or have to be taken with flash (unfortunately, the integrated flash is often crappy as well). This is my experience, but it might be unfair as I compared max. 200€-compact cameras with my rather bulky back-then 600€-SLR (it&#39;s an Canon EOS 400D, which is sold for under 400€ now).                                  </p>
<p>I haven&#39;t tested the camera myself, but the Lumix DMC-FX35 from Panasonic gets pretty good reviews and the price (180€) seems reasonable. Don&#39;t expect too much from it, but the pictures are certainly a gigantic leap from a mobile phone cam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra</title>
		<link>http://untangled.biz/kde/openexpo-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untangled.biz/blog/uncategorized/openexpo-2/#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>Oh and @blueget: everything will be a gigantic leap forward compared to that phone cam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and @blueget: everything will be a gigantic leap forward compared to that phone cam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra</title>
		<link>http://untangled.biz/kde/openexpo-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untangled.biz/blog/uncategorized/openexpo-2/#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. I think we all agree that an SLR camera takes the better pictures. :)

What I need however is something small and compact that will fit in my bag during exhibitions and does not force me to carry yet another bag to keep the camera comfy.

And besides, my talents as a photographer are very limited. A big camera would just be casting pearls before swine... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. I think we all agree that an SLR camera takes the better pictures. :)</p>
<p>What I need however is something small and compact that will fit in my bag during exhibitions and does not force me to carry yet another bag to keep the camera comfy.</p>
<p>And besides, my talents as a photographer are very limited. A big camera would just be casting pearls before swine&#8230; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://untangled.biz/kde/openexpo-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untangled.biz/blog/uncategorized/openexpo-2/#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d suggest a Canon Ixus of some description. I have always found the Canon compact cameras to be higher picture quality than many others, such as the Nikon compacts (which have the grainy image problems described in #1). Otherwise, Nikon or Canon SLRs, but those are heavier and larger and a lot more expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d suggest a Canon Ixus of some description. I have always found the Canon compact cameras to be higher picture quality than many others, such as the Nikon compacts (which have the grainy image problems described in #1). Otherwise, Nikon or Canon SLRs, but those are heavier and larger and a lot more expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Stephenson</title>
		<link>http://untangled.biz/kde/openexpo-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-4910</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Stephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untangled.biz/blog/uncategorized/openexpo-2/#comment-4910</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d get a Nikon D40.  Yes, it&#039;s a full on SLR, but the picture quality to weight ratio is far better than any of the compacts, and since it has &#039;only&#039; 6 or so megapixels the low-light performance that blueget mentioned is very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d get a Nikon D40.  Yes, it&#8217;s a full on SLR, but the picture quality to weight ratio is far better than any of the compacts, and since it has &#8216;only&#8217; 6 or so megapixels the low-light performance that blueget mentioned is very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueget</title>
		<link>http://untangled.biz/kde/openexpo-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-4905</link>
		<dc:creator>blueget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untangled.biz/blog/uncategorized/openexpo-2/#comment-4905</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, nearly all recent compact cameras are crap. They have extremely much megapixels, but the pictures are noisy like hell if taken at higher ISO Levels, which means that pictures taken inside rooms are either very noisy or have to be taken with flash (unfortunately, the integrated flash is often crappy as well). This is my experience, but it might be unfair as I compared max. 200€-compact cameras with my rather bulky back-then 600€-SLR (it&#039;s an Canon EOS 400D, which is sold for under 400€ now).                                  

I haven&#039;t tested the camera myself, but the Lumix DMC-FX35 from Panasonic gets pretty good reviews and the price (180€) seems reasonable. Don&#039;t expect too much from it, but the pictures are certainly a gigantic leap from a mobile phone cam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, nearly all recent compact cameras are crap. They have extremely much megapixels, but the pictures are noisy like hell if taken at higher ISO Levels, which means that pictures taken inside rooms are either very noisy or have to be taken with flash (unfortunately, the integrated flash is often crappy as well). This is my experience, but it might be unfair as I compared max. 200€-compact cameras with my rather bulky back-then 600€-SLR (it&#8217;s an Canon EOS 400D, which is sold for under 400€ now).                                  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tested the camera myself, but the Lumix DMC-FX35 from Panasonic gets pretty good reviews and the price (180€) seems reasonable. Don&#8217;t expect too much from it, but the pictures are certainly a gigantic leap from a mobile phone cam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

